Sign in to continue reading this article

Not registered? Create an account for free to read full articles on www.cliniciansbrief.com.

To access full articles on www.cliniciansbrief.com, please sign in below.

Busy? Sign in Faster. Sign into www.cliniciansbrief.com with your social media account.

Long-term management of Malassezia spp dermatitis, a common pruritic skin disease in dogs, is focused on treating the underlying trigger and on topical therapy strategies. Acute episodes are commonly treated with oral antifungals. Terbinafine hydrochloride (TBF) does not use the fungal cytochrome P450 pathway, which may make it less vulnerable to drug interactions and side effects as compared with azole drugs. Because TBF is available as a low-cost generic formulation, it is an attractive alternative to azoles. In humans, TBF has been shown to concentrate and persist in skin.

Oral TBF doses >30 mg/kg q24h may be needed for efficacy in the treatment of canine Malassezia spp dermatitis.

In this study, healthy dogs (n = 10) were given 30 mg/kg PO q24h of a generic TBF formulation for 21 days. TBF concentrations were measured in serum, sebum, and stratum corneum of the paw and thorax before and 3 hours after TBF administration on multiple days from day 1 to 35. Serum concentrations were significantly higher than were paw stratum corneum, thorax stratum corneum, and sebum concentrations. TBF did not accumulate or persist in canine stratum corneum or sebum as compared with serum. The mean maximum concentration for paw and thorax stratum corneum and for sebum barely exceeded the published Malassezia spp minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) of 0.25 μg/mL and never reached it in some subjects. Although multiple dogs had clinical laboratory values outside of the normal range, none of these values were considered clinically significant. Results indicated that, although well-tolerated, oral TBF doses >30 mg/kg q24h may be needed for efficacy in the treatment of canine Malassezia spp dermatitis, and further characterization of the Malassezia spp MIC and TBF efficacy would be useful.

Commentary

The major takeaway from this article is to avoid prescribing terbinafine for Malassezia spp dermatitis treatment. Terbinafine has been an attractive low-cost alternative to other azoles for treating Malassezia spp overgrowth, especially because it is part of many $4 and $12 prescription plans. In this commentator’s experience, clinical response in dogs to terbinafine was unimpressive as compared with ketoconazole. This was somewhat perplexing because this drug was effective for treating dermatophytosis. The findings in this study helped explain why. This is yet another example of why it is important to design not only species-specific pharmacokinetic studies but also organ-specific studies.—Karen A. Moriello, DVM, DACVD

References and author information Show
References

Source

Gimmler JR, White AG, Kennis RA, Cruz-Espindola C, Boothe DM. Determining canine skin concentrations of terbinafine to guide the treatment of Malassezia dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2015;26(6):411-416, e95-e96.

Author

Clinician's Brief (Capsule)

Material from Clinician’s Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.

Up Next