Content continues after advertisement

RBC Morphology Interpretation & Blood Film Review

Lisa M. Pohlman, DVM, MS, DACVP, Kansas State University

Clinical Pathology

|
August 2016

Sign in to Print/View PDF

In the Literature

Newman AW, Rishniw M, Behling-Kelly E. Reporting and interpreting red blood cell morphology: is there discordance between clinical pathologists and clinicians? Vet Clin Pathol. 2014;43(4):487-495.

FROM THE PAGE …

To assist in ranking differential diagnoses, clinical pathologists (CPs) report RBC morphologies on CBC reports. However, reporting lacks consistency because there are no standards. Clinician interpretation of reports may vary.

Blood film from a dog. Eccentrocytes (arrows) result from oxidative damage to the erythrocyte membrane; membrane fusion occurs and hemoglobin is pushed to 1 side of the cell. Eccentrocytes may be seen with other indicators of oxidative damage (eg, Heinz bodies [arrowhead]). Modified Wright’s stain, 1000× 

Clinician's Brief

Blood film from a dog. This dog has a Heinz body (arrowheads) hemolytic anemia caused by eating fried onions. Ghost cells (arrows) are erythrocyte membranes that have lost their hemoglobin via hemolysis; their presence indicates that hemolysis occurred before blood film preparation (either intravascular or in vitro). The ghost cells shown here also contain red-staining Heinz bodies. Modified Wright’s stain,1000×

Clinician's Brief

This study, via online surveys, examined the perceptions of CPs and clinicians with regard to the perceived value of reporting RBC morphologic abnormalities. Results from 1162 analyzable responses showed that some morphologies (eg, agglutination, spherocytes, polychromasia, Heinz bodies) were considered very useful to both clinicians and CPs. For other morphologies (eg, ghost cells, eccentrocytes), there was significant discordance between the groups: Most CPs deemed awareness of ghost cells or eccentrocytes very useful, whereas most clinicians disagreed. Of note, many clinicians admitted to being unfamiliar with the terms. 

The study also addressed blood film review; 28% of clinicians indicated a perception that a CP reviews every blood film, whereas 19% of CPs reported that a CP reviews a blood film for every CBC submitted. Most CPs indicated that review of all blood films is impractical and that protocol dictates a technologist review blood films and refer smears for review only if certain criteria are met. 

Explicating these discrepancies in clinical relevance, diagnostic expectations, and protocol standards will be an essential step toward better communication and improved patient care.

… TO YOUR PATIENTS

Key pearls to put into practice:

1. Ask the reference laboratory:

  • What are the criteria for blood film review?
  • How can I know if the blood smear was reviewed by a CP?
  • Is there a fee for a CP to review CBC submissions?

2. Call the laboratory, if necessary, to discuss the significance of the reported findings.

3. To receive complete information, provide a history and, ideally, the reason for submission. 

CBC = complete blood count, CP = clinical pathologist, RBC = red blood cell

For global readers, a calculator to convert laboratory values, dosages, and other measurements to SI units can be found here.

All Clinician's Brief content is reviewed for accuracy at the time of publication. Previously published content may not reflect recent developments in research and practice.

Material from Clinician's Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.

Podcasts

Clinician's Brief:
The Podcast
Listen as host Alyssa Watson, DVM, talks with the authors of your favorite Clinician’s Brief articles. Dig deeper and explore the conversations behind the content here.
Clinician's Brief provides relevant diagnostic and treatment information for small animal practitioners. It has been ranked the #1 most essential publication by small animal veterinarians for 9 years.*

*2007-2017 PERQ and Essential Media Studies

© Educational Concepts, L.L.C. dba Brief Media ™ All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Acceptable Use Policy