Content continues after advertisement

Phobias in Animals and Humans

Lisa Radosta, DVM, DACVB, Florida Veterinary Behavior Service, West Palm Beach, Florida

Mark DeAntonio, MD, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles


|January 2017|Peer Reviewed

Sign in to Print/View PDF

Phobias in Animals and Humans

Physicians and veterinarians have much to learn from each other, but minimal opportunities exist for collaborative scientific publication. The new Zoobiquity column in Clinician’s Brief will bring together experts in human and veterinary medicine to share insights into the overlapping conditions of different species. This interdisciplinary approach will expand clinicians’ understanding of conditions from cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and arthritis to behavioral conditions such as anxiety, compulsions, self-injury, and eating disorders. It is our hope that the exchanges serve as a model for similar conversations among animal and human doctors caring for the broadest range of conditions and species. Through such exchanges and collaborations, we believe the health of all the patients on the planet can be improved.— Barbara Natterson-Horowitz, Author of Zoobiquity

This column co-presents clinical cases in a side-by-side format, with the patient—human or veterinary—as the primary variable. It is the hope of the Clinician’s Brief team that readers will see the inherent commonalities in managing cases of similar diseases, regardless of species.

Noise & Storm Phobia in a Labrador Retriever

Lisa Radosta, DVM, DACVB

A 5-year-old spayed Labrador retriever was presented for fear of electronic sounds and storms.


At 2 years of age, the patient was adopted by a family with 2 adults and 2 elderly small-breed dogs (both with a history of thunderstorm and firework phobia). The family was her sixth home, as she had been returned to the shelter several times for various reasons (ie, too much energy, difficulty with another dog in the household, too many dogs in the household). 

The patient was up-to-date on all vaccinations and heartworm, flea, and tick prevention and had no significant medical history. CBC, serum chemistry profile, total T4 levels, and urinalysis were normal before presentation. Tick titers were not performed. She had no significant medical considerations, had high energy levels, and was exercised by leash walks 3 times daily. 

She began showing signs of panic when presented with electronic sounds and thunderstorms 1 year before presentation. Fear and panic occurred secondary to a variety of sounds (eg, nail clippers, finger snapping) but primarily resulted from electronic sounds (eg, oven, security alarm pad, washing machine, beeping sounds from television commercials or cell phones, high-pitched continuous sounds) and thunder. She also showed fear in response to predictive stimuli (eg, oven use, rain clouds). 

To alleviate the signs of fear, the family unplugged appliances, gave food rewards and attention, avoided triggering stimuli, and placed the patient in the bathroom with a food toy. Obedience training, food toys in a sound-protected area, ThunderShirt use, and loud music were attempted. These interventions resulted in some reduction in panic during storms but no alteration in clinical signs secondary to electronic sounds. Clomipramine (1.1 mg/kg PO q12h) and alprazolam (0.013 mg/kg PO 1 hour before storms [never to exceed q8h]) were initiated 11 months before presentation; clomipramine resulted in a calming effect without changes in intensity or frequency of clinical signs, and alprazolam resulted in a more rapid clinical recovery.

Clinical signs

The client described the following body language on patient exposure to an electronic sound or thunder: 

  • Ears back
  • Fidgeting
  • Height seeking
  • Escape attempts
  • Pacing
  • Panting
  • Hypersalivating
  • Seeking out family
  • Running to the closet

Recovery times varied for storms and electronic sounds; recovery could take up to 2 hours with exposure to electronic sound, whereas post-thunderstorm recovery could be within minutes with bathroom isolation, loud music, and a toy.

On examination, the patient was bright, alert, and responsive, with relaxed and friendly body language (ie, tail at back, wagging softly, ears forward, mouth hanging open). She ate treats out of a food toy, played with a plush toy, and eventually fell asleep during the appointment. The physical examination was within normal limits. 


The patient showed signs of panic when the sky turned dark (ie, predicting a storm) and not exclusively when she heard thunder. She was diagnosed with storm phobia.

In addition, she did not show fear between bouts, with the exception of when she heard electronic sounds. Because the patient showed signs of panic when presented with certain sounds but demonstrated no fear outside of those circumstances except during storms, she was likewise diagnosed with noise phobia.

A phobia is a disorder leading to persistent, excessive fear and physiologic responses to a stimulus. In the case of storm phobia, the reaction is to the phenomena associated with storms (eg, thunder, rain, dark clouds, change in barometric pressure, wind).1 Dogs diagnosed with storm phobia may initially have only noise phobia. As patients become classically conditioned to react to the stimuli that indicate an impending storm, they are candidates for a storm phobia diagnosis. In the case of noise phobia, the phobic reaction occurs with exposure to sounds. 


Treatment consisted of behavioral therapies, environmental management, and medical treatment. At the assessment, the owners were instructed to avoid triggers whenever possible.2 Whenever the patient heard an electronic sound, the owners were to show excitement, call the dog to them, and start playing with a toy or give her treats. 

They were also instructed to set up a sanctuary room using the closet that the patient retreated to when she panicked.3 Conditioning included using white noise and food toys in that space once daily. To decrease the likelihood of the white noise becoming a predictive stimulus for the storm and causing panic, it was used for all conditioning sessions. When the patient was conditioned to appreciate the sanctuary (as evidenced by her seeking that space), the owners were to direct her there during a storm, turn on the white noise, and give her a food toy. The owners wanted to use as little medication as possible, so the patient was weaned from clomipramine due to lack of efficacy. 

To reduce fear and panic on a daily basis, the owners were instructed to administer alprazolam (0.5 mg PO q8h) no more than q6h (0.013 mg/kg). Alprazolam has been shown to be effective in treating storm phobia along with behavior modification.1 The owners were informed of potential side effects and extralabel use. 

Treatment appointments every 2 weeks for the first 2 months with the veterinary behavior nurses were recommended. Behavioral therapies taught at those appointments consisted of relaxation4 and desensitization and counterconditioning3,5 exercises to electronic sounds. 

Relaxation exercises are intended to classically condition a state of physiologic calmness when the patient lies on a particular mat. There are 4 stages of learning: drive to the mat, duration on the mat, body language reinforcement, and physiologic calm. In this case, this exercise was used during storms so the patient could be with the family instead of in the sanctuary room. In addition, it was used to recover her after exposure to an electronic sound.

Desensitization and counterconditioning exposes the patient to the fear-producing stimulus at levels at which she does not react while receiving a reward that causes a positive emotional state.2,5 It is imperative that the stimuli that cause panic are avoided during this time and that every element of the stimulus is worked on separately. Because storms cannot be controlled nor avoided, it was not recommended that the owners attempt to desensitize and countercondition to storm sounds. Even outside of storm season, desensitization and counterconditioning is rarely successful in dogs that panic when exposed to predictive stimuli.  

At the first treatment, the patient was taught drive to and duration on the mat using freeze-dried chicken. In addition, the owners were educated on the clinical signs of fear, anxiety, and stress in dogs and were taught how to desensitize and countercondition her to electronic sounds by starting at a very low volume while pairing the sounds with a calm emotional state and food. They were cautioned to repeat at the same volume for at least 3 successful, consecutive sessions before moving to the next volume and to immediately decrease the volume if they noted any signs of fear or anxiety. 

At the second treatment, the patient was taught to achieve a calm emotional state on the mat. At this appointment, the owner reported that the patient was doing better. She no longer reacted to microwave sounds or television commercials. When she was startled by sounds, the owners called her and held up a finger. She focused on the finger and they gave her a treat. They reported that she recovered from panic in 2 to 3 minutes instead of hours. They were able to use her mat to help calm her when she was stressed. She could endure most electronic sounds during desensitization and counterconditioning at a volume between 2 and 3. Although her reactions had diminished in intensity, they had increased in frequency, and she still would not enter the kitchen. 

Fluoxetine was prescribed (10 mg PO q24h for 7 days, then 20 mg PO q24h for 7 days, then 30 mg PO q24h [0.83 mg/kg PO q24h]). The owners were informed of potential side effects and extralabel use. Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that has been shown to reduce noise phobias in dogs.2 Fluoxetine can take up to 6 weeks to effect a change in clinical signs. For that reason, the alprazolam dosage was increased to 0.75 mg PO q8h (0.02 mg/kg), with the intent of decreasing or eliminating alprazolam in 6 to 8 weeks.  

At the patient’s next appointment, the family reported that the episodes of panic continued to decrease in frequency and intensity.

References and Author Information

For global readers, a calculator to convert laboratory values, dosages, and other measurements to SI units can be found here.

All Clinician's Brief content is reviewed for accuracy at the time of publication. Previously published content may not reflect recent developments in research and practice.

Material from Clinician's Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.


Clinician's Brief:
The Podcast
Listen as host Alyssa Watson, DVM, talks with the authors of your favorite Clinician’s Brief articles. Dig deeper and explore the conversations behind the content here.
Clinician's Brief provides relevant diagnostic and treatment information for small animal practitioners. It has been ranked the #1 most essential publication by small animal veterinarians for 9 years.*

*2007-2017 PERQ and Essential Media Studies

© 2023 Educational Concepts, L.L.C. dba Brief Media ™ All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | DMCA Copyright | Privacy Policy | Acceptable Use Policy