Content continues after advertisement

Inhibiting CCDs in Serologic Allergy Testing

Jason Pieper, DVM, MS, DACVD, Iowa State University

Dermatology

|April/May 2021

Sign in to Print/View PDF

In the literature

Lee KW, McKinney BH, Blankenship KD, Morris DO. Detection and Inhibition of IgE for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants evident in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of allergen-specific IgE in the sera of dogs and cats. Vet Dermatol. 2020;31(6):439-e116.


FROM THE PAGE…

Most allergens are proteins or glycoproteins. The carbohydrate portions of glycoprotein (known as cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants [CCDs]) are generally thought to be clinically irrelevant in causing clinical signs; however, CCDs have been known to cause false-positive reactions in allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) testing in humans and dogs.1-3

This study* evaluated 100 canine serum samples and compared the ability of 2 different CCD inhibitors (RIDA-CCD and BROM-CCD) to reduce nonspecific CCD reactivity in serum samples evaluated for allergen-specific IgE. In addition, dog (n = 600) and cat (n = 600) serum samples were evaluated with and without BROM-CCD to investigate the prevalence of CCD in sera of dogs and cats suspected of having clinical allergy.

BROM-CCD was found to be as or more effective at inhibiting CCD as compared with the commercially available inhibitor, RIDA-CCD. CCDs were present in a significant number of canine and feline samples, and <1% and 13% of serologically positive canine and feline samples, respectively, were completely negative of all allergens after a CCD inhibitor was used. Samples positive to mite mixtures appeared to be true positives, as minimal changes were noted after treatment with a CCD inhibitor. Serum samples positive to grass, tree, and weed mixtures appeared to have a higher rate of false positives, as was seen after the samples were treated with a CCD inhibitor.

*Funding for this study was provided by Stallergenes Greer.

…TO YOUR PATIENTS

Key pearls to put into practice:

1

False positives are a common occurrence in serologic allergy testing because of CCDs.

 

2

A concern with serologic allergy testing is the variability among diagnostic laboratories (eg, only some laboratories use CCD inhibitors), as this can make comparisons difficult. Also, some CCD inhibitors appear to be more effective than others.

3

If serologic allergy testing indicates that a dog or cat is allergic to most or all tested allergens, the next logical step is to perform intradermal allergy testing, which can help eliminate false positives or confirm a panallergenic patient.

References

For global readers, a calculator to convert laboratory values, dosages, and other measurements to SI units can be found here.

All Clinician's Brief content is reviewed for accuracy at the time of publication. Previously published content may not reflect recent developments in research and practice.

Material from Clinician's Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.

Podcasts

Clinician's Brief:
The Podcast

Listen as host Alyssa Watson, DVM, talks with the authors of your favorite Clinician’s Brief articles. Dig deeper and explore the conversations behind the content here.
Clinician's Brief provides relevant diagnostic and treatment information for small animal practitioners. It has been ranked the #1 most essential publication by small animal veterinarians for 9 years.*

*2007-2017 PERQ and Essential Media Studies

© Educational Concepts, L.L.C. dba Brief Media ™ All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy (Updated 05/08/2018) Terms of Use (Updated 05/08/2018)