Bacterial culture with antimicrobial sensitivity testing is considered the criterion-referenced standard for UTI diagnosis in dogs, but it takes days and can be costly. The goal of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care rapid immunoassay (RIA) compared with bacterial culture for detecting UTIs in dogs.
Canine urine samples (n = 200) were tested using the RIA kit as well as routine bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Potential culture outcomes included negative, gram-positive, or gram-negative bacterial identification. RIA testing outcomes included negative, gram-indeterminate, or gram-negative.
Bacterial growth using culture methods was positive for 56/200 (28%) urine samples; 38 (19%) of these were likely associated with bacterial UTI based on sample collection method and bacterial culture. The RIA test was shown to have 97.4% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity for detecting samples likely associated with UTI. There was substantial agreement between bacterial culture and RIA outcome for UTI.
The authors noted that the RIA test lacks antimicrobial sensitivity analysis and therefore cannot be substituted for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. However, the test can quickly provide information about the organisms (gram-negative or gram-indeterminate) involved in a bacterial UTI, which may improve the clinician’s ability to choose appropriate empirical therapy. *This study was supported by Silver Lake Research Corp.
