Content continues after advertisement

Clicker Training for Shelter Puppies

Bonnie V. Beaver, DVM, MS, DSc (Hon), DPNAP, DACVB, DACAW, Texas A&M University

Behavior

|January/February 2021|Web-Exclusive

Sign in to Print/View PDF

In the literature

Dorey NR, Blandina A, Udell MAR. Clicker training does not enhance learning in mixed-breed shelter puppies (Canis familiaris). J Vet Behav. 2020;39:57-63.


FROM THE PAGE…

This study investigated the efficacy of 3 positive reinforcement methods (ie, food reward only, clicker reinforcement followed by food reward, praise reinforcement followed by food reward) in the training of training-naive shelter puppies.

A previous study showed that positive reinforcement (ie, offering a reward for a correct response to a command) is associated with the development of fewer unwanted behaviors in dogs.1 Pet owners are typically more comfortable using reward-based training. Use of clickers has also become an increasingly popular training method in several species. Clickers and praise are often considered to work as a bridge, in that these give immediate feedback that the animal’s response was correct while allowing the trainer time to reach for and offer a food reward. Clickers can offer a more consistent sound than is possible with the variability of tone and inflection of the human voice. However, laboratory-based studies have not shown animals learn faster when either clickers or praise are used in addition to traditional food-based reinforcement.2,3,4 This finding may be the result of a highly competent trainer administering the tests, as the trainer’s ability to quickly provide the food reinforcement might negate the need for a “bridge.”

This study found that puppies receiving clicker reinforcement followed by a food reward did not do better (and, in some cases, did worse) in learning a new task than puppies receiving positive reinforcement from food alone. Food is considered a primary reinforcer—something that is necessary for life. Sounds (eg, clickers, voice) are secondary reinforcers that need a learned connection with something positive (eg, food). The study’s finding is consistent with an earlier study that found food, but not stroking or praise, shortened the time taken to respond to a command in the early stages of training.5


…TO YOUR PATIENTS

Key pearls to put into practice:

1

Puppies may not be ready to make the connection between use of secondary (eg, clickers) and primary (eg, food) reinforcers.

 

2

Owners with puppies should be encouraged to use food rewards in training. Although it may be possible for some puppies to respond to social rewards (eg, praise) with the same enthusiasm as to food rewards, this is likely the exception.

3

Secondary reinforcers may be more successful when used in the training of older dogs.

References

For global readers, a calculator to convert laboratory values, dosages, and other measurements to SI units can be found here.

All Clinician's Brief content is reviewed for accuracy at the time of publication. Previously published content may not reflect recent developments in research and practice.

Material from Clinician's Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.

Podcasts

Clinician's Brief:
The Podcast

Listen as host Beckie Mossor, RVT, talks with the authors of your favorite Clinician’s Brief articles. Dig deeper and explore the conversations behind the content here.
Clinician's Brief provides relevant diagnostic and treatment information for small animal practitioners. It has been ranked the #1 most essential publication by small animal veterinarians for 9 years.*

*2007-2017 PERQ and Essential Media Studies

© Educational Concepts, L.L.C. dba Brief Media ™ All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy (Updated 05/08/2018) Terms of Use (Updated 05/08/2018)