Content continues after advertisement

It’s Quite Humerus

Clinician's Brief (Capsule)

Orthopedics

|October 2015

Sign in to Print/View PDF

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal pin size that can be inserted into the medial epicondyle during open and percutaneous normograde pinning of the distal humerus in dogs. Forelimb pairs from 16 cadaver dogs were separated for either percutaneous or open pinning, then divided into 3 groups based on intramedullary (IM) pin diameter relative to medullary canal diameter: 25% to 35%, 36% to 45%, or 46% to 55%. Normograde insertion of pins into the medial epicondyle was performed, with pins aimed to exit at the lateral aspect of the major tuberculum. Pin tracts were dissected, and damage to the soft tissue, bony structures, and entry/exit points was assessed. There were no differences in any outcomes between open and percutaneous techniques. Cortical bone damage was more frequent in the 46% to 55% group. The authors conclude that pins 36% to 45% of the diameter of the humeral medullary canal at the distal 80th percentile of humeral length can be inserted with an optimal exit point and minimal damage to the cortex of the medial epicondyle.

Global Commentary

IM pins, commonly applied in humeral fractures, provide good bending stability. Although I usually place these pins normograde from the proximal fragment, normograde placement from the distal fragment would be beneficial in some distal humeral fractures to increase bone purchase in the distal fragment. IM pins are frequently applied in combination with other stabilization techniques (eg, plates, external skeletal fixation), especially in comminuted fractures; the recommended size in this situation is around 30% to 40% of the medullary cavity. This would be a size range commonly used when applying IM pins in the humerus, and this study confirms these pins can be safely placed with minimal damage to bone when placed normograde from the distal fragment. However, when using larger pins or using IM pins in combination with cerclage wires for some diaphyseal humeral fractures, other pin placement methods (ie, normograde from the proximal fragment) would be more suitable.—Pilar Lafuente, DVM, PhD, DACVS-SA, DECVS, DACVSMR

This capsule is part of the WSAVA Global Edition of Clinician's Brief.

References

For global readers, a calculator to convert laboratory values, dosages, and other measurements to SI units can be found here.

All Clinician's Brief content is reviewed for accuracy at the time of publication. Previously published content may not reflect recent developments in research and practice.

Material from Clinician's Brief may not be reproduced, distributed, or used in whole or in part without prior permission of Educational Concepts, LLC. For questions or inquiries please contact us.

Podcasts

Clinician's Brief:
The Podcast
Listen as host Alyssa Watson, DVM, talks with the authors of your favorite Clinician’s Brief articles. Dig deeper and explore the conversations behind the content here.
Clinician's Brief provides relevant diagnostic and treatment information for small animal practitioners. It has been ranked the #1 most essential publication by small animal veterinarians for 9 years.*

*2007-2017 PERQ and Essential Media Studies

© 2023 Educational Concepts, L.L.C. dba Brief Media ™ All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions | DMCA Copyright | Privacy Policy | Acceptable Use Policy