EBP (historically known as pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophils) is a disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of lung and bronchial mucosa and an important differential diagnosis for patients presented with chronic cough, acute onset of respiratory distress, and/or exercise intolerance.1,2 Cough is typically harsh and may be associated with gagging and retching.
This disease can be seen at any age; however, dogs 4 to 6 years of age are most commonly represented.1-3 Although Siberian huskies and Alaskan malamutes may be overrepresented,2 the disease can occur in any dog breed.
Physical examination findings may reveal abnormal lung sounds, but auscultation can be normal.1,2 In addition, ≤24% of patients may have concurrent nasal discharge.1,2,4
Diagnosis requires strong clinical suspicion, as EBP is an uncommon cause of the primary clinical signs (ie, coughing, gagging, exercise intolerance). CBC may reveal an inflammatory leukogram (eg, eosinophilia, neutrophilia) in ≤60% of cases.4 Eosinophilia may raise clinical suspicion, but its absence does not rule out disease, as it is only present in 50% to 60% of cases.1,2,5
Thoracic radiographs are generally characterized by a diffuse bronchointerstitial pattern with peribronchial cuffing and thickening of the bronchial walls. In some cases, bronchiectasis or alveolar infiltration may be observed.2,6-8 Occasionally, patchy pulmonary opacities create a nodular appearance.4 Radiography is critical for ruling out other common causes of cough and/or acute respiratory distress. Concurrent disease processes (eg, cardiomegaly, tracheal collapse) can complicate diagnosis.
EBP on thoracic computed tomography has been characterized by parenchymal abnormalities (93%) and bronchial wall thickening (87%) in most dogs. Many dogs also had mucus and/or debris that occluded the bronchial lumen (73%), lymphadenopathy (67%), or bronchiectasis (60%).9 Approximately 33% of dogs had pulmonary nodules, as has been identified on radiographs.4,9
Cytologic evaluation of the airways confirms eosinophilic inflammation, which is the hallmark of diagnosis. The percentage of eosinophils (mean, 61% of the total nucleated cell population4) exceeds that of healthy dogs (5%-24%).2,5,10 Samples can be obtained via tracheal wash or bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy allows for visualization of more characteristic airway associated changes (eg, greenish-yellow secretions, irregular mucosa, hyperemia).2,5,11 Occasionally, intraluminal granulomas may be present,4 allowing for mucosal brush samples or biopsies that can further support a diagnosis. Tracheal washes provide appropriate cytologic samples in most cases. Bronchoscopy is generally reserved for patients with more focal radiographic disease, concerns for neoplasia, or suspicion for concurrent structural disorders (eg, bronchial collapse, tracheal collapse).
Cytologic evaluation is critical to help rule out parasitic disease that can also result in eosinophilic inflammatory response. Fecal testing (ie, Baermann test, fecal centrifugation) for parasitic disease is recommended; however, because negative results do not rule out parasitic disease, repeat testing and/or empirical therapy is advisable, particularly in at-risk patients.12 Heartworm testing is also indicated because heartworm disease may be associated with pneumonitis and eosinophilic inflammation (Table).13