3 years ago, we conducted an informal telephone survey; 19 out of 20 vet clinics in a large MN metro area wanted to know if our anonymous cat owner wanted a declaw with their cat's neuter or spay. Where is the "surgery of last resort" here? Even the AVMA declaw policy is not being followed. When a professional cannot ethically follow their own national organization's stand on declawing by offering alternatives to declawing first, I think that State and local legislators have every right and responsibility to regulate this unnecessary surgery.
The argument about the non declawed cats being euthanized is emotional blackmail. In fact when the declawed cat starts biting and inappropriate elimination, the owner gets rid of the cat just as fast and conveniently as they paid to have the cat's claws amputated.
The declaw damage can and does happen over time. The gradual hyperflexion of the P1/P2 joint causes the cat to walk on the distal P2 bone ends. Add obesity to this and the cat is even more painful. As a top predator cats hide their pain very well. I think "out of sight out of mind" applies here. Can you diagnose a hyperflexed condition in a declawed cat's paw? Checked lately for lumbar muscle cramping or pain? If you want to see proximal P3 bone fragments use a dental x-ray unit with an oblique dorsopalmar exposure. This technique also shows hyperflexion and distal P2 osteomyelitis. The outlawing of declaws is just helping our profession do the right thing for a sentient feeling problem solving creature. Just maybe we can get back some respect from our international colleagues by just saying no to declawing another cat and offering alternatives. The current anti declaw legislation should never be viewed as a power struggle between the vet profession and the public it serves. This is an overused argument based on fear not fact.
You are welcome to visit www.msvets.com pet library to see video and x-rays on declaw repair indications and surgery.
Ron Gaskin DVM

California Cities Ban Declawing
California's battle over whether or not to allow the declawing of domestic cats has reached a boiling point. This summer, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill that would block local governments from passing ordinances to ban declawing. The bill was scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2010 and was passed in order to appease groups like The California Veterinary Medical Association, who opposed local bans on declawing. In fact, the CVMA actually took West Hollywood to court to have the city's local ban reversed, but lost. The CVMA was concerned about additional California towns copycatting (no pun intended) the ban on declawing and in order to prevent this, made a push for a statewide law that would prevent individual cities from passing anti-declawing legislation.
But with California's massive economic problems looming and resentment building between state and local officials, city and county representatives are pushing back on this statewide legislation. Towns are now rushing to pass local bans before the January 1st deadline, legislation that would take precedence over the state law. Currently, the cities of Berkeley, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood have all passed anti-declawing ordinances. More cities may follow suit.
According to the CVMA’s president Mark Nunez,“The decision to declaw a cat should remain between the owner in consultation with his, or her, veterinarian on a case-by-case basis.” Because most people declaw their cats due to property damage or safety concerns, many veterinarians are worried that pet owners may choose to euthanize or give up their cats if they share these concerns and cannot declaw them. However, animal rights activists argue that a cat's claws are used for balance, exercise, and stretching (particularly the muscles in their legs, back, shoulders, and paws). Although it is a controversial belief and one many veterinarians do not share, some opponents of declawing feel that removal of the last digits drastically alters the conformation of their feet and causes the feet to meet the ground at an unnatural angle that can cause back pain similar to that in humans caused by wearing improper shoes.
In a recent survey conducted by The Southern California Veterinary Medical Association, most veterinarians considered the removal of claws to be performed only after every other option was exercised.
How do you feel about declawing: Are you in favor of these local bans on the procedure or against them? Do you feel the declawing saves the lives of cats whose owners would otherwise choose to euthanize/abandon them?
1 comments so far...
Comments posted on this discussion forum are the opinion of the comment writer and should not be construed as medical advice or as being the opinion of the publisher. Comments may be removed or edited at the discretion of the publisher.
Vet professional's responsiblity of informing owner lacking
- reply
- Array
![[Clinician's Brief logo]](/sites/default/themes/cb/images/logo.png)










